1. Introduction
线性代数是研究有限维向量空间 上的线性映射 的学科。
课程路线:
C ⟶ Lists ⟶ F n ⟶ Vector Space ⟶ Subspaces \mathbb{C} \longrightarrow \text{Lists} \longrightarrow F^n \longrightarrow \text{Vector Space} \longrightarrow \text{Subspaces} C ⟶ Lists ⟶ F n ⟶ Vector Space ⟶ Subspaces
在实数与复数同时研究时,能得到更好的定理和更深的洞察。
将平面(R 2 \mathbb{R}^2 R 2 )和普通空间(R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 )推广到 R n \mathbb{R}^n R n 和 C n \mathbb{C}^n C n 。
再进一步抽象为向量空间 (vector space)的一般概念。
子空间(subspace)之于向量空间,类似于子集之于集合。
2. Complex Numbers
2.1 Definition
Definition 1.1 (Complex Numbers, C \mathbb{C} C )
一个复数 是一个有序对 ( a , b ) (a,b) ( a , b ) ,其中 a , b ∈ R a, b \in \mathbb{R} a , b ∈ R ,记作 a + b i a + bi a + bi 。
所有复数的集合记为 C = { a + b i : a , b ∈ R } \mathbb{C} = \{a + bi : a, b \in \mathbb{R}\} C = { a + bi : a , b ∈ R } 。
加法和乘法定义为:
( a + b i ) + ( c + d i ) = ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i (a+bi) + (c+di) = (a+c) + (b+d)i ( a + bi ) + ( c + d i ) = ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i
( a + b i ) ( c + d i ) = ( a c − b d ) + ( a d + b c ) i (a+bi)(c+di) = (ac - bd) + (ad + bc)i ( a + bi ) ( c + d i ) = ( a c − b d ) + ( a d + b c ) i
将 a + 0 i a + 0i a + 0 i 等同于实数 a a a ,故 R ⊂ C \mathbb{R} \subset \mathbb{C} R ⊂ C 。
符号 i i i 由 Euler 于 1777 年首次使用,表示 − 1 \sqrt{-1} − 1 。
乘法公式的动机:假设 i 2 = − 1 i^2 = -1 i 2 = − 1 ,利用通常的算术规则展开即可。
2.2 Properties of Complex Arithmetic (1.3)
性质 内容 交换律 α + β = β + α \alpha + \beta = \beta + \alpha α + β = β + α ,α β = β α \alpha\beta = \beta\alpha α β = β α 结合律 ( α + β ) + λ = α + ( β + λ ) (\alpha+\beta)+\lambda = \alpha+(\beta+\lambda) ( α + β ) + λ = α + ( β + λ ) ,( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) (\alpha\beta)\lambda = \alpha(\beta\lambda) ( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) 单位元 λ + 0 = λ \lambda + 0 = \lambda λ + 0 = λ ,λ ⋅ 1 = λ \lambda \cdot 1 = \lambda λ ⋅ 1 = λ 加法逆元 对每个 α ∈ C \alpha \in \mathbb{C} α ∈ C ,存在唯一 β \beta β 使 α + β = 0 \alpha + \beta = 0 α + β = 0 乘法逆元 对每个 α ≠ 0 \alpha \neq 0 α = 0 ,存在唯一 β \beta β 使 α β = 1 \alpha\beta = 1 α β = 1 分配律 λ ( α + β ) = λ α + λ β \lambda(\alpha + \beta) = \lambda\alpha + \lambda\beta λ ( α + β ) = λ α + λ β
2.3 Notation: − α -\alpha − α , Subtraction, 1 / α 1/\alpha 1/ α , Division
− α -\alpha − α :α \alpha α 的加法逆元
β − α = β + ( − α ) \beta - \alpha = \beta + (-\alpha) β − α = β + ( − α )
1 / α 1/\alpha 1/ α :α ≠ 0 \alpha \neq 0 α = 0 时的乘法逆元
β / α = β ( 1 / α ) \beta / \alpha = \beta(1/\alpha) β / α = β ( 1/ α )
3. Notation: F F F
Notation 1.6
本书中 F F F 表示 R \mathbb{R} R 或 C \mathbb{C} C 。
4. Lists
Definition 1.8 (List, Length)
长度为 n n n 的列表(list) 是 n n n 个元素的有序集合。
两个列表相等 ⟺ \iff ⟺ 长度相同且对应位置的元素相同。
列表与集合的区别:
列表中顺序有意义 :( 3 , 5 ) ≠ ( 5 , 3 ) (3,5) \neq (5,3) ( 3 , 5 ) = ( 5 , 3 ) ,但 { 3 , 5 } = { 5 , 3 } \{3,5\} = \{5,3\} { 3 , 5 } = { 5 , 3 } 。
列表中重复有意义 :( 4 , 4 ) ≠ ( 4 , 4 , 4 ) (4,4) \neq (4,4,4) ( 4 , 4 ) = ( 4 , 4 , 4 ) ,但 { 4 , 4 } = { 4 , 4 , 4 } = { 4 } \{4,4\} = \{4,4,4\} = \{4\} { 4 , 4 } = { 4 , 4 , 4 } = { 4 } 。
许多数学家将长度为 n n n 的列表称为 n n n -元组(n n n -tuple)。
5. F n F^n F n
Definition 1.11 (F n F^n F n , Coordinate)
F n = { ( x 1 , … , x n ) : x k ∈ F for k = 1 , … , n } F^n = \{(x_1, \dots, x_n) : x_k \in F \text{ for } k = 1, \dots, n\} F n = {( x 1 , … , x n ) : x k ∈ F for k = 1 , … , n }
其中 x k x_k x k 称为第 k k k 个坐标(coordinate) 。
5.1 运算定义
运算 定义 加法 ( x 1 , … , x n ) + ( y 1 , … , y n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 , … , x n + y n ) (x_1,\dots,x_n) + (y_1,\dots,y_n) = (x_1+y_1,\dots,x_n+y_n) ( x 1 , … , x n ) + ( y 1 , … , y n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 , … , x n + y n ) 零元 0 = ( 0 , … , 0 ) 0 = (0, \dots, 0) 0 = ( 0 , … , 0 ) 加法逆元 − x = ( − x 1 , … , − x n ) -x = (-x_1, \dots, -x_n) − x = ( − x 1 , … , − x n ) ,满足 x + ( − x ) = 0 x + (-x) = 0 x + ( − x ) = 0 标量乘法 λ ( x 1 , … , x n ) = ( λ x 1 , … , λ x n ) \lambda(x_1,\dots,x_n) = (\lambda x_1, \dots, \lambda x_n) λ ( x 1 , … , x n ) = ( λ x 1 , … , λ x n )
5.2 基本性质
加法交换律 (1.14):x + y = y + x x + y = y + x x + y = y + x
注意:符号 0 0 0 在不同语境下含义不同——可以是 F n F^n F n 中的零向量,也可以是 F F F 中的数 0 0 0 。
6. Fields(域)
Definition
一个域(field) 是一个包含至少两个不同元素 0 0 0 和 1 1 1 的集合,配备加法和乘法运算,满足 1.3 中列出的所有性质(交换律、结合律、单位元、逆元、分配律)。
例子:
R \mathbb{R} R (实数)
C \mathbb{C} C (复数)
Q \mathbb{Q} Q (有理数)
{ 0 , 1 } \{0, 1\} { 0 , 1 } ,其中 1 + 1 = 0 1 + 1 = 0 1 + 1 = 0 (即 Z 2 \mathbb{Z}_2 Z 2 )
注意: 本书中只处理 R \mathbb{R} R 和 C \mathbb{C} C ,但许多定义和定理对任意域同样成立。
7. Vector Space(向量空间)
7.1 动机
从 F n F^n F n 的运算性质中抽象出来:加法交换、结合、有单位元、有逆元;标量乘法结合;分配律连接两种运算。
7.2 Definition
下面用 定义 1.20 把这套运算公理正式固定下来。
Definition 1.20 (Vector Space)
一个向量空间 是一个集合 V V V ,配备加法 + : V × V → V +: V \times V \to V + : V × V → V 和标量乘法 ⋅ : F × V → V \cdot: F \times V \to V ⋅ : F × V → V ,满足以下六条公理:
编号 公理 内容 (1) 交换律 u + v = v + u u + v = v + u u + v = v + u ,∀ u , v ∈ V \forall\, u,v \in V ∀ u , v ∈ V (2) 结合律 ( u + v ) + w = u + ( v + w ) (u+v)+w = u+(v+w) ( u + v ) + w = u + ( v + w ) 且 ( a b ) v = a ( b v ) (ab)v = a(bv) ( ab ) v = a ( b v ) (3) 加法单位元 ∃ 0 ∈ V \exists\, 0 \in V ∃ 0 ∈ V 使得 v + 0 = v v + 0 = v v + 0 = v ,∀ v ∈ V \forall\, v \in V ∀ v ∈ V (4) 加法逆元 ∀ v ∈ V \forall\, v \in V ∀ v ∈ V ,∃ w ∈ V \exists\, w \in V ∃ w ∈ V 使得 v + w = 0 v + w = 0 v + w = 0 (5) 乘法单位元 1 v = v 1v = v 1 v = v ,∀ v ∈ V \forall\, v \in V ∀ v ∈ V (6) 分配律 a ( u + v ) = a u + a v a(u+v) = au + av a ( u + v ) = a u + a v 且 ( a + b ) v = a v + b v (a+b)v = av + bv ( a + b ) v = a v + b v
7.3 相关术语
V V V 的元素称为向量(vector)或 点(point) 。
若 F = R F = \mathbb{R} F = R ,称 V V V 为实向量空间 ;若 F = C F = \mathbb{C} F = C ,称 V V V 为复向量空间 。
最简单的向量空间是 { 0 } \{0\} { 0 } 。
7.4 例子
F n F^n F n (通常的加法和标量乘法)
F ∞ F^\infty F ∞ :所有 F F F 中元素构成的序列
F S F^S F S :从集合 S S S 到 F F F 的所有函数,加法和标量乘法逐点定义:
( f + g ) ( x ) = f ( x ) + g ( x ) , ( λ f ) ( x ) = λ f ( x ) (f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x), \quad (\lambda f)(x) = \lambda f(x) ( f + g ) ( x ) = f ( x ) + g ( x ) , ( λ f ) ( x ) = λ f ( x )
加法单位元是零函数 0 ( x ) = 0 0(x) = 0 0 ( x ) = 0 ,f f f 的加法逆元是 − f -f − f 。
8. Elementary Properties
8.1 唯一性
Theorem 1.26 (Unique Additive Identity)
向量空间的加法单位元唯一。
证明思路: 设 0 0 0 和 0 ′ 0' 0 ′ 都是加法单位元,则 0 ′ = 0 ′ + 0 = 0 + 0 ′ = 0 0' = 0' + 0 = 0 + 0' = 0 0 ′ = 0 ′ + 0 = 0 + 0 ′ = 0 。
Theorem 1.27 (Unique Additive Inverse)
每个元素的加法逆元唯一。
证明思路: 设 w w w 和 w ′ w' w ′ 都是 v v v 的加法逆元,则 w = w + 0 = w + ( v + w ′ ) = ( w + v ) + w ′ = 0 + w ′ = w ′ w = w + 0 = w + (v + w') = (w+v) + w' = 0 + w' = w' w = w + 0 = w + ( v + w ′ ) = ( w + v ) + w ′ = 0 + w ′ = w ′ 。
8.2 基本等式
结果 内容 证明关键 1.30 0 v = 0 0v = 0 0 v = 0 (标量 0 0 0 乘任意向量 = 零向量)分配律:0 v = ( 0 + 0 ) v = 0 v + 0 v 0v = (0+0)v = 0v + 0v 0 v = ( 0 + 0 ) v = 0 v + 0 v 1.31 a 0 = 0 a0 = 0 a 0 = 0 (任意标量乘零向量 = 零向量)分配律:a 0 = a ( 0 + 0 ) = a 0 + a 0 a0 = a(0+0) = a0 + a0 a 0 = a ( 0 + 0 ) = a 0 + a 0 1.32 ( − 1 ) v = − v (-1)v = -v ( − 1 ) v = − v v + ( − 1 ) v = 1 v + ( − 1 ) v = ( 1 + ( − 1 ) ) v = 0 v = 0 v + (-1)v = 1v + (-1)v = (1+(-1))v = 0v = 0 v + ( − 1 ) v = 1 v + ( − 1 ) v = ( 1 + ( − 1 )) v = 0 v = 0
8.3 消去律(Cancellation Law)
Theorem (Cancellation Law)
若 x + z = y + z x + z = y + z x + z = y + z ,则 x = y x = y x = y 。
证明: 取 v v v 使得 z + v = 0 z + v = 0 z + v = 0 ,则
x = x + 0 = x + ( z + v ) = ( x + z ) + v = ( y + z ) + v = y + ( z + v ) = y + 0 = y . ■ x = x + 0 = x + (z+v) = (x+z) + v = (y+z) + v = y + (z+v) = y + 0 = y. \quad \blacksquare x = x + 0 = x + ( z + v ) = ( x + z ) + v = ( y + z ) + v = y + ( z + v ) = y + 0 = y . ■
9. 反例:验证公理的必要性
Example. 设 V = { ( a 1 , a 2 ) : a 1 , a 2 ∈ R } V = \{(a_1, a_2) : a_1, a_2 \in \mathbb{R}\} V = {( a 1 , a 2 ) : a 1 , a 2 ∈ R } ,定义
( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + 2 b 1 , a 2 + 2 b 2 ) (a_1, a_2) + (b_1, b_2) = (a_1 + 2b_1,\; a_2 + 2b_2) ( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + 2 b 1 , a 2 + 2 b 2 )
c ( a 1 , a 2 ) = ( c a 1 , c a 2 ) c(a_1, a_2) = (ca_1, ca_2) c ( a 1 , a 2 ) = ( c a 1 , c a 2 )
问:V V V 在此运算下是否为 R \mathbb{R} R 上的向量空间?
答:不是。 加法不满足交换律:
( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + 2 b 1 , a 2 + 2 b 2 ) (a_1, a_2) + (b_1, b_2) = (a_1 + 2b_1, a_2 + 2b_2) ( a 1 , a 2 ) + ( b 1 , b 2 ) = ( a 1 + 2 b 1 , a 2 + 2 b 2 )
( b 1 , b 2 ) + ( a 1 , a 2 ) = ( b 1 + 2 a 1 , b 2 + 2 a 2 ) (b_1, b_2) + (a_1, a_2) = (b_1 + 2a_1, b_2 + 2a_2) ( b 1 , b 2 ) + ( a 1 , a 2 ) = ( b 1 + 2 a 1 , b 2 + 2 a 2 )
一般地 a 1 + 2 b 1 ≠ b 1 + 2 a 1 a_1 + 2b_1 \neq b_1 + 2a_1 a 1 + 2 b 1 = b 1 + 2 a 1 ,故公理 (1) 失败。
10. 概念联系图
ℂ (复数:具体代数结构)
│
▼
Lists (有序元组:强调顺序与重复)
│
▼
Fⁿ (坐标向量:加法 + 标量乘法)
│ 抽象出运算公理
▼
Vector Space V over Field F
│ (下节课)
▼
Subspace (子空间)
核心思想: 每一步都是”去掉具体结构,保留运算公理”的抽象化过程。F n F^n F n 是向量空间的原型 ,向量空间定义中的六条公理恰好是 F n F^n F n 运算满足的所有代数性质。
11. Exercises (from LADR, Sheldon Axler)
复数运算(1.A)
题号 考查内容 1.A.1 证明 α + β = β + α \alpha + \beta = \beta + \alpha α + β = β + α ,∀ α , β ∈ C \forall\, \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C} ∀ α , β ∈ C (加法交换律) 1.A.3 证明 ( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) (\alpha\beta)\lambda = \alpha(\beta\lambda) ( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) ,∀ α , β , λ ∈ C \forall\, \alpha, \beta, \lambda \in \mathbb{C} ∀ α , β , λ ∈ C (乘法结合律)
F n F^n F n 的运算验证(1.A)
题号 考查内容 1.A.11 证明 ( x + y ) + z = x + ( y + z ) (x+y)+z = x+(y+z) ( x + y ) + z = x + ( y + z ) ,∀ x , y , z ∈ F n \forall\, x,y,z \in F^n ∀ x , y , z ∈ F n (加法结合律) 1.A.12 证明 ( a b ) x = a ( b x ) (ab)x = a(bx) ( ab ) x = a ( b x ) ,∀ x ∈ F n \forall\, x \in F^n ∀ x ∈ F n ,a , b ∈ F a,b \in F a , b ∈ F (标量乘法结合律) 1.A.14 证明 λ ( x + y ) = λ x + λ y \lambda(x+y) = \lambda x + \lambda y λ ( x + y ) = λ x + λ y ,∀ λ ∈ F \forall\, \lambda \in F ∀ λ ∈ F ,x , y ∈ F n x,y \in F^n x , y ∈ F n (分配律)
向量空间公理与抽象证明(1.B)
题号 考查内容 1.B.2 若 a ∈ F a \in F a ∈ F ,v ∈ V v \in V v ∈ V ,且 a v = 0 av = 0 a v = 0 ,证明 a = 0 a = 0 a = 0 或 v = 0 v = 0 v = 0 1.B.3 若 v , w ∈ V v, w \in V v , w ∈ V ,解释为何存在唯一 x ∈ V x \in V x ∈ V 使得 v + 3 x = w v + 3x = w v + 3 x = w 1.B.4 空集不是向量空间——它恰好违反了哪一条公理?(答:加法单位元的存在性) 1.B.5 证明在向量空间定义中,“加法逆元”条件可替换为”0 v = 0 0v = 0 0 v = 0 ,∀ v ∈ V \forall v \in V ∀ v ∈ V ”
1.A.1 Show that α + β = β + α \alpha + \beta = \beta + \alpha α + β = β + α for all α , β ∈ C \alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{C} α , β ∈ C .
sol:
Axiom: ∀ m , n ∈ R , m + n = n + m \forall\ m,n \in \mathbb{R},\ m + n = n + m ∀ m , n ∈ R , m + n = n + m .
Let α = a + b i , β = c + d i \alpha = a+bi,\beta=c+di α = a + bi , β = c + d i , where a , b , c , d ∈ R a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{R} a , b , c , d ∈ R ,
then α + β = a + b i + c + d i : = ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i \alpha + \beta = a + bi + c + di := (a + c) + (b + d)i α + β = a + bi + c + d i := ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i ,
and β + α = c + d i + a + b i : = ( c + a ) + ( d + b ) i \beta + \alpha = c + di + a + bi := (c + a) + (d + b)i β + α = c + d i + a + bi := ( c + a ) + ( d + b ) i .
By applying the axiom, α + β = ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i = ( c + a ) + ( d + b ) i = β + α \alpha + \beta = (a + c) + (b + d)i = (c + a) + (d + b)i = \beta + \alpha α + β = ( a + c ) + ( b + d ) i = ( c + a ) + ( d + b ) i = β + α .
1.A.3 Show that ( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) (\alpha \beta)\lambda = \alpha(\beta\lambda) ( α β ) λ = α ( β λ ) for all α , β , λ ∈ C \alpha,\beta,\lambda \in \mathbb{C} α , β , λ ∈ C .
sol:
Let α = a + b i , β = c + d i , λ = e + f i \alpha = a + bi, \beta = c + di, \lambda = e + fi α = a + bi , β = c + d i , λ = e + f i , where a , b , c , d , e , f ∈ R a,b,c,d,e,f \in \mathbb{R} a , b , c , d , e , f ∈ R ,
then
( α β ) λ = ( ( a + b i ) ( c + d i ) ) ( e + f i ) = ( ( 𝑎 𝑐 − 𝑏 𝑑 ) + ( 𝑎 𝑑 + 𝑏 𝑐 ) 𝑖 ) ( e + f i ) (\alpha\beta)\lambda = ((a + bi)(c + di))(e + fi) = ((𝑎𝑐 −𝑏𝑑) +(𝑎𝑑 +𝑏𝑐)𝑖)(e + fi) ( α β ) λ = (( a + bi ) ( c + d i )) ( e + f i ) = (( a c − b d ) + ( a d + b c ) i ) ( e + f i )
by definition of multiplication on C \mathbb{C} C .
In next step, we apply the definition again on ( 𝑎 𝑐 − 𝑏 𝑑 ) + ( 𝑎 𝑑 + 𝑏 𝑐 ) 𝑖 (𝑎𝑐 −𝑏𝑑) +(𝑎𝑑 +𝑏𝑐)𝑖 ( a c − b d ) + ( a d + b c ) i and e + f i e + fi e + f i .
Thus, we gain ( α β ) λ = ( a c e − b d e − a d f − b c f ) + ( a d e + b c e + a c f − b d f ) i (\alpha\beta)\lambda = (ace - bde - adf - bcf) + (ade + bce + acf - bdf)i ( α β ) λ = ( a ce − b d e − a df − b c f ) + ( a d e + b ce + a c f − b df ) i .
Similarly,
α ( β λ ) = ( a + b i ) ( ( c e − d f ) + ( d e + c f ) i ) = ( a c e − a d f − b d e − b c f ) + ( a d e + a c f + b c e − b d f ) i = ( a c e − b d e − a d f − b c f ) + ( a d e + b c e + a c f − b d f ) i = ( α β ) λ \begin{aligned}
\alpha(\beta\lambda) &= (a + bi)((ce - df) + (de + cf)i) \\
&= (ace - adf - bde - bcf) + (ade + acf + bce - bdf)i\\
&= (ace - bde - adf - bcf) + (ade + bce + acf - bdf)i\\
&= (\alpha\beta)\lambda
\end{aligned} α ( β λ ) = ( a + bi ) (( ce − df ) + ( d e + c f ) i ) = ( a ce − a df − b d e − b c f ) + ( a d e + a c f + b ce − b df ) i = ( a ce − b d e − a df − b c f ) + ( a d e + b ce + a c f − b df ) i = ( α β ) λ
1.A.11 Show that ( x + y ) + z = x + ( y + z ) (x + y)+z = x+(y+z) ( x + y ) + z = x + ( y + z ) for all x , y , z ∈ F n x,y,z ∈ \mathbb{F}^n x , y , z ∈ F n
sol:
Let:
x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n ) , y = ( y 1 , y 2 , . . . , y n ) , z = ( z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n ) . \begin{aligned}
&x = (x_1,x_2,...,x_n),\\
&y = (y_1,y_2,...,y_n),\\
&z = (z_1,z_2,...,z_n).
\end{aligned} x = ( x 1 , x 2 , ... , x n ) , y = ( y 1 , y 2 , ... , y n ) , z = ( z 1 , z 2 , ... , z n ) .
( x + y ) + z = ( x 1 + y 1 , x 2 + y 2 , . . . , x n + y n ) + z (x+y)+z=(x_1+y_1,x_2+y_2,...,x_n+y_n)+z\ ( x + y ) + z = ( x 1 + y 1 , x 2 + y 2 , ... , x n + y n ) + z by definition of addition in F n \mathbb{F}^n F n .
Denotes ( x 1 + y 1 , x 2 + y 2 , . . . , x n + y n ) (x_1+y_1,x_2+y_2,...,x_n+y_n) ( x 1 + y 1 , x 2 + y 2 , ... , x n + y n ) as a vector γ ∈ F n \gamma \in \mathbb{F}^n γ ∈ F n ,
then
( x + y ) + z = γ + z = ( ( x 1 + y 1 ) + z 1 , ( x 2 + y 2 ) + z 2 , . . . , ( x n + y n ) + z n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 , x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , . . . , x n + y n + z n ) ( associativity in R ) \begin{aligned}
(x + y) + z &= \gamma + z \\&= ((x_1+y_1)+z_1,(x_2+y_2)+z_2,...,(x_n+y_n)+z_n)
\\&= (x_1+y_1+z_1,x_2+y_2+z_2,...,x_n+y_n+z_n)\quad (\text{associativity in}\ \mathbb{R})
\end{aligned} ( x + y ) + z = γ + z = (( x 1 + y 1 ) + z 1 , ( x 2 + y 2 ) + z 2 , ... , ( x n + y n ) + z n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 , x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , ... , x n + y n + z n ) ( associativity in R )
Similarly,
x + ( y + z ) = x + ( y 1 + z 1 , y 2 + z 2 , . . . , y n + z n ) = ( x 1 + ( y 1 + z 1 ) , x 2 + ( y 2 + z 2 ) , . . . , x n + ( y n + z n ) ) = ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 , x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , . . . , x n + y n + z n ) ( associativity in R ) = ( x + y ) + z \begin{aligned}
x + (y + z) &= x + (y_1+z_1,y_2+z_2,...,y_n+z_n) \\
&= (x_1+(y_1+z_1),x_2+(y_2+z_2),...,x_n+(y_n+z_n))\\
&= (x_1+y_1+z_1,x_2+y_2+z_2,...,x_n+y_n+z_n)\quad (\text{associativity in}\ \mathbb{R})\\
&= (x + y) + z
\end{aligned} x + ( y + z ) = x + ( y 1 + z 1 , y 2 + z 2 , ... , y n + z n ) = ( x 1 + ( y 1 + z 1 ) , x 2 + ( y 2 + z 2 ) , ... , x n + ( y n + z n )) = ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 , x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , ... , x n + y n + z n ) ( associativity in R ) = ( x + y ) + z
1.A.12 Show that ( a b ) x = a ( b x ) (ab)x = a(bx) ( ab ) x = a ( b x ) for all 𝑥 ∈ F n 𝑥 ∈ \mathbb{F}^n x ∈ F n and all a , b ∈ F a,b ∈ \mathbb{F} a , b ∈ F
sol:
Let x x x be ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n ) ∈ F n and a , b ∈ F (x_1,x_2,...,x_n) \in \mathbb{F}^n\ \text{and}\ a,b \in \mathbb{F} ( x 1 , x 2 , ... , x n ) ∈ F n and a , b ∈ F .
By the definition of scalar multiplication in F n \mathbb{F}^n F n ,
( a b ) x = ( ( a b ) x 1 , ( a b ) x 2 , . . . , ( a b ) x n ) = ( a b x 1 , a b x 2 , . . . , a b x n ) , \begin{aligned}
(ab)x &= ((ab)x_1,(ab)x_2,...,(ab)x_n) \\&= (abx_1,abx_2,...,abx_n),
\end{aligned} ( ab ) x = (( ab ) x 1 , ( ab ) x 2 , ... , ( ab ) x n ) = ( ab x 1 , ab x 2 , ... , ab x n ) ,
and
( b x ) = ( b x 1 , b x 2 , . . . , b x n ) : = y ∈ F n . (bx) = (bx_1,bx_2,...,bx_n) := y \in \mathbb{F}^n. ( b x ) = ( b x 1 , b x 2 , ... , b x n ) := y ∈ F n .
Then by the associativity of multiplication in the field F \mathbb{F} F , we know that ( a b ) x i = a ( b x i ) (ab)x_i = a(bx_i) ( ab ) x i = a ( b x i ) for each i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n i = 1,2,...,n i = 1 , 2 , ... , n . Thus,
a ( b x ) = a y = ( a y 1 , a y 2 , . . . , a y n ) = ( a ( b x 1 ) , a ( b x 2 ) , . . . , a ( b x n ) ) = ( a b x 1 , a b x 2 , . . . , a b x n ) = ( a b ) x . \begin{aligned}
a(bx) &= ay\\
&= (ay_1,ay_2,...,ay_n)\\
&= (a(bx_1),a(bx_2),...,a(bx_n)) \\&= (abx_1,abx_2,...,abx_n) \\&= (ab)x.
\end{aligned} a ( b x ) = a y = ( a y 1 , a y 2 , ... , a y n ) = ( a ( b x 1 ) , a ( b x 2 ) , ... , a ( b x n )) = ( ab x 1 , ab x 2 , ... , ab x n ) = ( ab ) x .
1.A.14 Show that λ ( x + y ) = λ x + λ y \lambda(x + y) = \lambda x + \lambda y λ ( x + y ) = λ x + λ y for all λ ∈ F \lambda ∈ \mathbb{F} λ ∈ F and all x , y ∈ F n x,y ∈ \mathbb{F}^n x , y ∈ F n .
sol:
By the definition of addition in F n \mathbb{F}^n F n ,
x + y = ( x 1 , . . . , x n ) + ( y 1 , . . . , y n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 , . . . , x n + y n ) . x + y = (x_1, ...,x_n) + (y_1,...,y_n) = (x_1 +y_1,...,x_n + y_n). x + y = ( x 1 , ... , x n ) + ( y 1 , ... , y n ) = ( x 1 + y 1 , ... , x n + y n ) .
And by the definition of scalar multiplication in F n \mathbb{F}^n F n ,
λ ( x + y ) = ( λ ( x 1 + y 1 ) , . . . , λ ( x n + y n ) ) = ( λ x 1 + λ y 1 , . . . , λ x n + λ y n ) = ( λ x 1 , . . . , λ x n ) + ( λ y 1 , . . . , λ y n ) = λ x + λ y \begin{aligned}
\lambda(x + y) = (\lambda(x_1 + y_1), ..., \lambda(x_n + y_n)) &= (\lambda x_1 + \lambda y_1, ..., \lambda x_n + \lambda y_n)\\
&= (\lambda x_1, ..., \lambda x_n) + (\lambda y_1, ..., \lambda y_n)\\
&= \lambda x + \lambda y
\end{aligned} λ ( x + y ) = ( λ ( x 1 + y 1 ) , ... , λ ( x n + y n )) = ( λ x 1 + λ y 1 , ... , λ x n + λ y n ) = ( λ x 1 , ... , λ x n ) + ( λ y 1 , ... , λ y n ) = λ x + λ y
1.B.2 Suppose a ∈ F , v ∈ V a ∈ \mathbb{F},v ∈ V a ∈ F , v ∈ V ,and a v = 0 av = 0 a v = 0 . Prove that a = 0 a = 0 a = 0 or v = 0 v = 0 v = 0 .
sol:
Suppose a ≠ 0 a \neq 0 a = 0 :
Since a ∈ F a ∈ \mathbb{F} a ∈ F , ∃ a − 1 ∈ F s . t . a − 1 ⋅ a = 1 \exists\ a^{-1} \in \mathbb{F}\ s.t.\ a^{-1} \cdot a = 1 ∃ a − 1 ∈ F s . t . a − 1 ⋅ a = 1 .
By the associativity of scalar multiplication, a − 1 ( a v ) = ( a − 1 a ) v a^{−1} (av)=(a^{−1} a)v a − 1 ( a v ) = ( a − 1 a ) v
Then multiply a − 1 a^{-1} a − 1 on both side of equation, \
a − 1 ⋅ a v = a − 1 ⋅ 0 ⇒ associativity of scalar multiplication 1 ⋅ v = 0 ⇒ multiplicative identity v = 0 a^{-1} \cdot av = a^{-1} \cdot 0 \ \overset{\text{associativity of scalar multiplication}}\Rightarrow\ 1 \cdot v = 0\ \overset{\text{multiplicative identity}}\Rightarrow\ v = 0 a − 1 ⋅ a v = a − 1 ⋅ 0 ⇒ associativity of scalar multiplication 1 ⋅ v = 0 ⇒ multiplicative identity v = 0
Conversely, if we suppose a = 0 a = 0 a = 0 : The equality obviously holds.
Thus, we have shown that if a ≠ 0 a \neq 0 a = 0 , v = 0 v = 0 v = 0 . This is logically equivalent to saying that a = 0 a = 0 a = 0 or v = 0 v = 0 v = 0 .
1.B.3 Suppose v , w ∈ V v,w ∈ V v , w ∈ V . Explain why there exists a unique x ∈ V x ∈ V x ∈ V such that v + 3 x = w v + 3x = w v + 3 x = w .
sol:
Existence:
Since v ∈ V v \in V v ∈ V , ∃ − v ∈ V s . t . v + ( − v ) = 0 \exists\ -v \in V\ s.t.\ v + (-v) = 0 ∃ − v ∈ V s . t . v + ( − v ) = 0 .
Let x = 1 3 ( w + ( − v ) ) x = \frac{1}{3}(w+(− v)) x = 3 1 ( w + ( − v )) . Then
v + 3 x = v + 3 ( 1 3 ( w + ( − v ) ) ) = v + ( 3 ⋅ 1 3 ) ( w + ( − v ) ) (associativity of scalar multiplication) = v + 1 ( w + ( − v ) ) (field arithmetic) = v + ( w + ( − v ) ) (multiplicative identity) = v + ( ( − v ) + w ) (commutativity of addition) = ( v + ( − v ) ) + w (associativity of addition) = 0 + w (additive inverse) = w (additive identity) \begin{aligned}
v + 3x &= v + 3\left(\frac{1}{3}(w + (-v))\right) \\
&= v + \left(3 \cdot \frac{1}{3}\right)(w + (-v)) \quad \text{(associativity of scalar multiplication)} \\
&= v + 1(w + (-v)) \quad \text{(field arithmetic)} \\
&= v + (w + (-v)) \quad \text{(multiplicative identity)} \\
&= v + ((-v) + w) \quad \text{(commutativity of addition)} \\
&= (v + (-v)) + w \quad \text{(associativity of addition)} \\
&= 0 + w \quad \text{(additive inverse)} \\
&= w \quad \text{(additive identity)}
\end{aligned} v + 3 x = v + 3 ( 3 1 ( w + ( − v )) ) = v + ( 3 ⋅ 3 1 ) ( w + ( − v )) (associativity of scalar multiplication) = v + 1 ( w + ( − v )) (field arithmetic) = v + ( w + ( − v )) (multiplicative identity) = v + (( − v ) + w ) (commutativity of addition) = ( v + ( − v )) + w (associativity of addition) = 0 + w (additive inverse) = w (additive identity)
Thus, such an x x x exists.
Uniqueness:
Suppose x 1 , x 2 ∈ V x_1, x_2 \in V x 1 , x 2 ∈ V both satisfy the equation, meaning:
v + 3 x 1 = w and v + 3 x 2 = w v + 3x_1 = w \quad \text{and} \quad v + 3x_2 = w v + 3 x 1 = w and v + 3 x 2 = w
Therefore, v + 3 x 1 = v + 3 x 2 . v + 3x_1 = v + 3x_2. v + 3 x 1 = v + 3 x 2 .
Add − v -v − v to both the side (same process as proving the Cancellation Law for Vector Addition ):
− v + v + 3 x 1 = − v + v + 3 x 2 ⇒ 0 + 3 x 1 = 0 + 3 x 2 ⇒ 3 x 1 = 3 x 2 ⇒ 1 3 ⋅ 3 x 1 = 1 3 ⋅ 3 x 2 ⇒ 1 ⋅ x 1 = 1 ⋅ x 2 ⇒ Multiplicative Identity x 1 = x 2 \begin{aligned}
-v + v + 3x_1 &= -v + v + 3x_2\\
\Rightarrow 0 + 3x_1 &= 0 + 3x_2\\
\Rightarrow 3x_1 &= 3x_2\\
\Rightarrow \frac{1}{3} \cdot 3x_1 &= \frac{1}{3} \cdot 3x_2\\
\Rightarrow 1 \cdot x_1 &= 1 \cdot x_2\\
\overset{\text{Multiplicative Identity}}\Rightarrow\ x_1 &= x_2
\end{aligned} − v + v + 3 x 1 ⇒ 0 + 3 x 1 ⇒ 3 x 1 ⇒ 3 1 ⋅ 3 x 1 ⇒ 1 ⋅ x 1 ⇒ Multiplicative Identity x 1 = − v + v + 3 x 2 = 0 + 3 x 2 = 3 x 2 = 3 1 ⋅ 3 x 2 = 1 ⋅ x 2 = x 2
Thus, the solution is unique.
1.B.4 The empty set is not a vector space. The empty set fails to satisfy only one
of the requirements listed in the definition of a vector space (1.20). Which
one?
sol:
The additive identity because there isn’t a definition of 0.
This is an existential statement ( ∃ 0 ∈ V , … ).
Since the empty set contains no elements at all, no such element 0 can exist.
Therefore this axiom is false for V = ∅ V = ∅ V = ∅ .
All other axioms in Definition 1.20 — including:
commutativity, associativity, additive inverse, multiplicative identity, and the distributive properties — are universal statements of the form “for all v ∈ V , …” or “for all u , v ∈ V , … ”.
When V = ∅ V = ∅ V = ∅ , these statements are vacuously true, because there are no elements in V V V that could serve as counterexamples.
In particular, the additive inverse axiom (“for every v ∈ V v ∈ V v ∈ V , there exists w ∈ V w ∈ V w ∈ V such that v + w = 0 v + w = 0 v + w = 0 ”) is vacuously true:
since there is no v ∈ ∅ v ∈ ∅ v ∈ ∅ to check, the condition is satisfied by default. Thus, the additive identity is the only axiom that fails for the empty set.
1.B.5 Show that in the definition of a vector space (1.20), the additive inverse
condition can be replaced with the condition that
0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V 0v = 0\ \text{for all}\ v \in V 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V
Here the 0 on the left side is the number 0, and the 0 on the right side is the
additive identity of V V V . The phrase a “condition can be replaced” in a definition means that the
collection of objects satisfying the definition is unchanged if the original
condition is replaced with the new condition.
sol:
Part I :
0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇒ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0 0v = 0\ \text{for all}\ v \in V\ \Rightarrow\ \forall\ v \in V,\ \exists\ w \in V\ s.t.\ v+w=0 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇒ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0 :
Let v v v be any of the vector in V V V .
Then ( − 1 ) v (-1)v ( − 1 ) v is exactly the additive inverse of v v v . Following is the proof:\
v + ( − 1 ) v = 1 v + ( − 1 ) v (multiplicative identity) = ( 1 + ( − 1 ) ) v (distributive property) = 0 v = 0 ( 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ) \begin{aligned}
v + (-1)v &= 1v + (-1)v \quad \text{(multiplicative identity)}\\
&= (1+(-1))v \quad \text{(distributive property)}\\
&= 0v\\
&= 0 \quad (0v = 0\ \text{for all}\ v \in V)
\end{aligned} v + ( − 1 ) v = 1 v + ( − 1 ) v (multiplicative identity) = ( 1 + ( − 1 )) v (distributive property) = 0 v = 0 ( 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V )
Part II : 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇐ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0 0v = 0\ \text{for all}\ v \in V\ \Leftarrow\ \forall\ v \in V,\ \exists\ w \in V\ s.t.\ v+w=0 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇐ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0 :
Let w w w be the additive inverse of 0 v 0v 0 v :
0 v = ( 0 + 0 ) v 0 v = 0 v + 0 v (distributive property) 0 v + w = 0 v + 0 v + w 0 v + w = 0 v + ( 0 v + w ) (associativity) 0 = 0 v + 0 (additive inverse) 0 = 0 v (additive identity) \begin{aligned}
0v &= (0+0)v\\
0v &= 0v+0v \quad \text{(distributive property)}\\
0v + w &= 0v + 0v + w\\
0v + w &= 0v + (0v + w) \quad \text{(associativity)}\\
0 &= 0v + 0 \quad \text{(additive inverse)}\\
0 &= 0v \quad \text{(additive identity)}
\end{aligned} 0 v 0 v 0 v + w 0 v + w 0 0 = ( 0 + 0 ) v = 0 v + 0 v (distributive property) = 0 v + 0 v + w = 0 v + ( 0 v + w ) (associativity) = 0 v + 0 (additive inverse) = 0 v (additive identity)
Thus 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇔ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0 0v = 0\ \text{for all}\ v \in V\ \Leftrightarrow\ \forall\ v \in V,\ \exists\ w \in V\ s.t.\ v+w=0 0 v = 0 for all v ∈ V ⇔ ∀ v ∈ V , ∃ w ∈ V s . t . v + w = 0
12. Questions to Carry Forward
如何判断一个子集是否为子空间?(下节课:三个条件)
子空间的和(sum)与直和(direct sum)如何定义?
为什么”更多变量齐次方程必有非零解”可以用向量空间语言证明?